Populism as Core Element of FascismFascism is a complex political current that parasitizes other ideologies,
includes many internal tensions and contradictions, and has chameleon-like
adaptations based on the specific historic symbols, icons, slogans, traditions,
myths, and heroes of the society it wishes to mobilize. In addition,
fascism as a social movement often acts dramatically different from fascism
once it holds state power. When holding state power, fascism tends to
be rigidly hierarchical, authoritarian, and elitist. As a social movement
fascism employs populist appeals against the current regime and promises
a dramatic and quick transformation of the status quo.
In interwar Europe there were three distinct forms of fascism, Italian
economic corporatist fascism (the original fascism), German racial nationalist
Nazism, and clerical fascism exemplified by religious/nationalist movements
in Croatia, Hungary, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and the Ukraine, among
others.
Right-wing populism can act as both a precursor and a building block
of fascism, with anti-elitist conspiracism and ethnocentric scapegoating
as shared elements. The dynamic of right-wing populism interacting with
and facilitating fascism in interwar Germany was chronicled by Peter
Fritzsche in Rehearsals for Fascism: Populism and Political Mobilization
in Weimar Germany. Fritzsche showed that distressed middle-class
populists in Weimar launched bitter attacks against both the government
and big business. This populist surge was later exploited by the Nazis
which parasitized the forms and themes of the populists and moved their
constituencies far to the right through ideological appeals involving
demagoguery, scapegoating, and conspiracism.
==="The Nazis expressed the populist yearnings of middle-class
constituents and at the same time advocated a strong and resolutely anti-Marxist
mobilization....Against "unnaturally" divisive parties and
querulous organized interest groups, National Socialists cast themselves
as representatives of the commonweal, of an allegedly betrayed and neglected
German public....[b]reaking social barriers of status and caste, and
celebrating at least rhetorically the populist ideal of the people's
community..."
This populist rhetoric of the Nazis, focused the pre-existing "resentments
of ordinary middle-class Germans against the bourgeois 'establishment'
and against economic and political privilege, and by promising the resolution
of these resentments in a forward-looking, technologically capable volkisch
'utopia,'" according to Fritzsche.
As Umberto Eco explains, however, the populist rhetoric of fascism
is selective and illusive:
==="individuals as individuals have no rights, and the People
is conceived as a quality, a monolithic entity expressing the Common
Will. Since no large quantity of human beings can have a common will,
the Leader pretends to be their interpreter. Having lost their power
of delegation, citizens do not act; they are only called on to play the
role of the People. Thus the People is a theatrical fiction....There
is in our future a TV or Internet populism, in which the emotional response
of a selected group of citizens can be presented and accepted as the
Voice of the People....Wherever a politician casts doubt on the legitimacy
of a parliament because it no longer represents the Voice of the People,
we can smell...Fascism."
Fritzsche observed that "German fascism would have been inconceivable
without the profound transformation" of mainstream electoral politics
in the 1920's "which saw the dissolution of traditional party allegiances." He
also argued that the Nazis, while an electorally-focused movement, had
more in common rhetorically and stylistically with middle class reform
movements than backwards looking reactionary movements. So the Nazis
as a movement appeared to provide for radical social change while actually
moving its constituency to the right.
The success of fascist movements in attracting members from reformist
populist constituencies is due to many complex overlapping factors, but
key factors are certainly the depth of the economic and social crisis
and transformation of, and the degree of anger and frustration of those
who see their demands not being met. Desperate people turn to desperate
solutions.
|