Understanding Systems of Oppression
What do we mean when we say that various forms of oppression are "institutionalized" in the United States?
When writing about the social evils of prejudice and oppression, the devil is in the details. Many older studies of prejudice had a "tendency to collapse distinctions between types of prejudice..." observes Young-Bruehl. They assumed "that a nationalism and racism, an ethnocentric prejudice and an ideology of desire, can be dynamically the same..." Furthermore, she writes "there is a tendency to approach prejudice either psychologically or sociologically without consideration for the interplay of psychological and sociological factors." In a complementary fashion, Buechler notes that issues of class, race, and gender are "omnipresent in the background of all forms of collective action" and reflect "institutional embeddedness within the social fabric at all levels." But he adds that these are distinct yet overlapping structures of power that need to be assessed both independently and jointly. To do this it is important "to theorize the different, specific, underlying dynamics that distinguish one structure from another." Ultimately, the successful assertion of "collective human rights" or "group rights" depends on the "linking of ethnicity/race, class, gender, and sexuality," argues Felice, because this linkage "mutes supremacist tendencies by denying the right of any one group to assert supremacy over a different group". For brevity, this constellation of identities sometimes is referred to as race, gender, and class.
To unravel systems of oppression involving race, gender, and class
we need a more complex formula that is better at mapping out the
dynamics of societal oppressions in ways that resonate with the
everyday experiences
of our colleagues, students, neighbors, and families. This is especially
important in an era of open hostility to discussions of supremacy,
domination, and oppression. Developing a concept of "racial formation," Omi
and Winant argue that "racial projects" that are "racist" entail
a linkage between "essentialist representations of race and social
structures of domination." They further argue that "racial
ideology and social structure" act in an interconnected and dialectical
manner to shape racist projects. Applying these concepts to racism,
sexism, and heterosexism, I think it is useful to define societal oppression
as the result of a dynamic process involving ideas, acts, and a hierarchical
position of dominance that is structural. The dominance enshrined in "social
structures of domination" involves both unequal power and privilege.
The resulting formula is as follows:
Supremacist Ideology + Discriminatory Acts + Structural Dominance = Oppression.
From: Chip Berlet. 2004. “Mapping the Political Right: Gender
and Race Oppression in Right-Wing Movements.” In Abby Ferber,
ed, Home-Grown Hate: Gender and Organized Racism. New York: Routledge.
Systems of Oppression
- Antisemitism
- Christian Right & Theocracy
- Government Misconduct
- Hate and Ethnoviolence
- Heterosexism & Homophobia
- Racism & Xenophobia
- Sexism & Reproductive Rights
What to Do!
PRA is an affiliate of:
Copyright Information, Terms, and Conditions
Please read our Terms and Conditions for copyright information regarding downloading, copying, printing, and linking material on this site; our disclaimer about links present on this website; and our privacy policy.