|
In addition, he said,
he holds “a certificate in human rights from the
International Institute of Human Rights in Strasbourg,
France.” “I stand before you a world traveler, having
spoken on this topic in almost forty countries,” he
said. “I’ve written several books.”
Lively went on to describe his family background—which
has enough in it to keep a psychologist, armchair or
other, occupied for a long time: he is the oldest of six
children, and his father developed a mental illness when
Lively was young. Lively himself became an alcoholic at
the age of twelve. For the next sixteen years, he said,
he couldn’t hold a job. He slept under bridges and
begged for money on the streets. A brother and a sister,
he said, “went into homosexuality,” and another sister
“wasn’t able to enter into marriage until she was in her
forties because of the pain of the family life that we
had.” Finally, said Lively, “[I] got down on my knees
and surrendered my life to Jesus Christ. I was healed in
an instant. I never had another desire to drink or use
drugs ever again. When I got up off my knees, I was
clean and healed.”
Lively became involved in antigay activism because of
two people who were, he said, “very close to me”—a
four-year-old boy and a nineteen-year-old man, who,
Lively said, molested the boy: “And I saw what happened
to that little child. He was transformed [from] a sweet
and innocent person into a tortured and tormented child,
filled with anger and rage. And he never recovered from
it.” The nineteen year old, Lively said, “is still
living in a gay lifestyle in Los Angeles, California.
He’s an active homosexual and he’s active in a church
that endorses what’s called ‘gay theology.’”
Lively “had his eyes
opened” to all this right after he became a Christian,
he said. “And God moved me very quickly into a ministry
where I would deal with these things. And so for all of
these years, I have been focusing on this topic. I know
more about this than almost anyone in the world.”
What Lively “knows”
and came to warn his Ugandan audience about is chilling.
He told them that one of the most common causes of
homosexuality is child molestation; that’s how gays
recruit children into homosexuality, he said. He told
them that European gays were flooding Uganda with money
and gifts to recruit children. “They are very
predatory,” he said.
They
are very sexually oriented. They want to satisfy their
sexual desires. Often these are people that are molested
themselves and they’re turning it around. And they’re
looking for other people to be able to prey upon. And
when they see a child that’s from a broken home, it’s
like they have a flashing neon sign over their head.
He told the Ugandans
about what he said are the various kinds of gays: the
transsexuals, the transvestites, the effeminate gays,
and the “normal” ones, who blend in. They are the
hardest to spot, he said. Then there are the others:
machos and, worst of all, he said, the “super machos.”
It’s the latter two groups, Lively claimed, who founded
the Nazi party and helped Hitler to come to power.
“These are men who have very little restraint,” he said.
They
are so far from normalcy that they’re killers. They’re
serial killers, mass murderers. … This is the kind of
person that it takes to run a gas chamber, right? Or to
do a mass murder, like—the Rwandan stuff probably
involved these guys.
There’s some dispute
about whether Mark Twain actually said, “A lie can
travel halfway around the world while the truth is
putting on its shoes.” But there is no dispute that
Scott Lively has thoroughly proven this truism. “The gay
movement is an evil institution,” he told his spellbound
Ugandan audience. “The goal of the gay movement is to
defeat the marriage-based society and replace it with a
culture of sexual promiscuity.” His voice rising and his
eyes flashing with anger, he continued, If you deny and
reject the design of your own body, and you engage in
conduct that is self-evidently wrong and harmful to you,
then you’re going to receive in your body the penalty of
your error which is appropriate. Can anyone say AIDS?
The Ugandan audience
was unfamiliar with this American colloquialism. They
didn't understand that Lively's question was rhetorical.
“AIDS,” some obediently but quietly answered. They knew
AIDS all too well, a disease which began making itself
known in the Congo River Basin in neighboring Zaire as
far back as the 1960s,[i]
long before it appeared on Western medicine's radar. By
1982, doctors became aware of a new disease in rural
Uganda that the locals dubbed “slim,” because of the way
people who had it wasted away.[ii]
It was (and is) a disease mainly of heterosexuals.
A Pushpin on the Hate
Map
The peripatetic
antigay activist has traveled the world, and everywhere
he goes, wholesale lies about gay people fall about him
like acorns in autumn. In 2007, Lively was particularly
active, traveling to Riga, Latvia, in the spring; then
to Novosibirsk, Russia; then back to Riga. “There is a
war going on the world,” he told his Novosibirsk
audience. “It’s a war between Christians and
homosexuals.” The war, he said, is “the design of the
devil to destroy civilization, because civilization is
based on the natural family.”[iii]
This kind of rhetoric
landed Lively on the Hate Map developed by the Southern
Poverty Law Center (SPLC) [http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/hate-map#s=ID].
The SPLC tracks more than 1,000 hate groups across the
United States, but only seventeen of them are
highlighted as specifically antigay. Lively’s Abiding
Truth Ministries is one of them, and Lively has
connections with several others. In 2007, he helped to
found the international Watchmen On The Walls, which
quickly landed on the SPLC’s antigay list (The Watchmen
are no longer active in the United States). He has
spoken at fundraising banquets for MassResistance,
written several articles for the Chalcedon Foundation, a
Christian Reconstructionist organization which endorses
the revival of the Old Testament punishments of death
for gay people. He has contributed money[iv]
to anti-gay activist and former Washington Times
reporter Peter LaBarbera’s Americans for Truth about
Homosexuality.[v]
He continued to contribute to discredited “researcher”
Paul Cameron’s Family Research Institute long after
Cameron called for the quarantining of HIV-positive gay
men and expressed admiration for how the Nazis “dealt
with homosexuality.”[vi]
All of these groups are on that same, short SPLC antigay
list.
The Oregon Years
Lively cut his teeth
on antigay activism in Eugene, Oregon, where a February
1991 article in the Eugene Register-Guard
described him as the assistant director for the Oregon
Citizens Alliance (OCA).[vii]
OCA had been formed just a few years earlier by Vietnam
vet, ex-hippie, and born-again Christian Lon Mabon,[viii]
with support from the Oregon branch of Pat Roberston’s
Christian Coalition.[ix]
(Lively and Mabon served on the Oregon Christian
Coalition’s board of directors until 1993.) According to
the article, Lively denounced a group of protesters
against the first Gulf War as “burned-out hippies and
professional malcontents.” His rhetoric wasn’t terribly
original, but he was just getting started. The OCA would
be his training ground.
Lively quickly gained
a reputation for being a loose canon. In October 1991,
the photographer Catherine Stauffer attended a church
meeting where the OCA was previewing a videotape it had
cobbled together in preparation for a campaign in
support of a series of local antigay ballot measures
across the state. Lively ejected Stauffer from the
meeting forcefully, by throwing her against the wall and
dragging her across the floor.[x]
She sued Lively and OCA. The jury determined that Lively
was guilty of using unreasonable force and awarded
Stauffer $20,000.[xi]
OCA’s ballot measures
were far reaching. They would prohibit “promoting,
encouraging or facilitating homosexuality”—restrictions
that would determine such basic community issues as
which books could be accepted into the local library and
which groups could access city facilities, including
streets and parks. They would institute a double
standard: for example, OCA could hold meetings in city
buildings, while Parents and Friends of Lesbians and
Gays could not.
Lively took a
particular interest in the contest in Springfield,[xii]
a suburb of Eugene. An antigay ballot measure passed
there by a margin of 54 percent to 46 percent,[xiii]
making Springfield the first city in the country to pass
such an ordinance. But even there Lively’s intemperance
once again got him in trouble. In a press release, he
carelessly suggested that the former Springfield Human
Rights Commissioner George Wickizer was “a practicing
homosexual man.” Wickizer wasn’t, and he sued[xiv]:
being falsely labeled a homosexual was considered libel
at the time. But Lively lucked out. The court ruled that
Wickizer was a public figure, making winning a libel
case difficult.[xv]
Sure enough, Wickizer lost.
The Springfield win
propelled the OCA toward its fall statewide campaign for
a proposed amendment to the Oregon Constitution that
would bar the state from using “monies or properties to
promote, encourage or facilitate homosexuality,
pedophilia, sadism or masochism.” It required all levels
of government, including school systems, to recognize
“that these behaviors are abnormal, wrong, unnatural and
perverse and they are to be discouraged and avoided.”
The proposal, known as Measure 9, was the most severe
statewide antigay measure ever proposed in the United
States, and the campaign was acrimonious. Lively
described gay people as “living a voluntary lifestyle
based on sodomy,” and alleged that child molestation by
other homosexuals was the most likely cause of
homosexuality.[xvi]
He also released a video purporting to demonstrate the
kind of sexual activity in which gay men and lesbians
commonly engaged. The video was loaded with false health
information as well as testimony from two ex-gays—men
who claimed to have rejected homosexuality to become
straight.[xvii]
Payback Time: The
Nazi Connection
Lively’s and the
OCA’s campaign backfired. Measure 9 was defeated 56
percent to 44 percent,[xviii]
and the OCA took a drubbing as well. A statewide poll
after the election found that 57 percent of all
Oregonians had an unfavorable opinion of the alliance,
while only 14 percent were favorable.[xix]
Lively and OCA were undeterred. Two years later, they
returned with Measure 13, a slightly watered-down
version of Measure 9. Measure 13 was also defeated, but
Lively used this campaign to try out a new rhetorical
theme. Appearing on a public-access cable program in
Salem, Oregon, he tied homosexuality to the Nazi Party.
“It wasn’t just that homosexuals were involved in the
Nazi Party,” Lively told the television audience.
Homosexuals created the Nazi Party, and everything that
we think about when we think about Nazis actually comes
from the minds and perverted ideas of homosexuals. When
you think of the Nazi Party… you cannot help but
understand that this organization was a machine
constructed by militant, sadomasochistic, pedophilic
homosexuals. … They built the Nazi machine. They were
the people that ran it, and that put it together. Most
people understand that there were some homosexuals
involved in the Nazi Party—no, it wasn’t that. They were
the foundation of the Nazi Party.
Where did this idea
come from? OCA’s Lon Mabon remembered that back in 1991,
when he had filed papers in Springfield for the local
antigay measure, he had passed hecklers calling him
“Nazi,” “Mr. Ayatollah,” and “hatemonger.” Mabon
reportedly said that Lively had “gotten tired of being
called Nazi.” He decided to do some digging and
concluded that “many Nazi leaders were homosexuals and
that the Nazi Party was closely tied to pre-Nazi
Germany’s gay-rights movement.”[xx]
In other words, this was payback time.
As Lively was
developing this theme, he may have come across an
article written by Kevin Abrams, a Canadian Orthodox Jew
who moved to Israel, that appeared in Peter LaBarbera’s
Lambda Report in August 1994.[xxi]
“If history is to be told accurately,” Abrams wrote, the
behavior of homosexuals under Hitler’s barbarous rule
provides further evidence that homosexuality is a
pathology… Ironically, the record shows that there was
far more brutality, rape, torture and murder committed
against innocent people by Nazi deviants and homosexuals
than there ever was against homosexuals.
Lively and Abrams
quickly joined forces, releasing a book in July 1995
titled, The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi
Party. The book, now in its fourth edition,
solidified Lively’s career, not just as an antigay
extremist but also as a Holocaust revisionist—although
Lively denies that he blames gay people for the
Holocaust. He reserves the actual blame for Satan;
homosexuals, he says, were merely “instruments in its
enactment.”[xxii]
The vast homosexual conspiracies detailed in The Pink
Swastika were sweeping: that gay people are
naturally violent,[xxiii]
predatory,[xxiv]
and hostile to all moral norms;[xxv]
that the permissiveness of the Weimar Republic provided
the opening necessary for gays to wield power;[xxvi]
that Nazi ideology was a modern revival of pagan “homo-occultism;”[xxvii]
that homosexuals specifically target the youth, both for
political indoctrination as well as sexual induction;[xxviii]
that, yes, some gays were killed, but they were the
effeminate ones targeted by the “butch” in their
unquenchable thirst for absolute power;[xxix]
that the Nazi Party’s stranglehold on German life was
the direct result of this bloodlust;[xxx]
and that the same fate awaits any nation that institutes
equality for LGBT people.
The few historians
who bothered to comment on Lively’s historical revisions
dismissed them as farce,[xxxi]
while Charles Schiffman, Executive Director of the
Jewish Federation of Portland, expressed outrage over
Lively’s “low effort to use a terrible tragedy for
political purposes.”[xxxii]
Lively and Abrams were unfazed. Lively, in particular,
now had a mission: to sound the alarm that what had
happened in Nazi Germany could happen here. “From the
ashes of Nazi Germany,” he wrote, “the homofascist
Phoenix has arisen again—this time in the United
States.”[xxxiii]
And not just in the United States. Lively has sounded
this warning everywhere he goes.
Going Global
Some time in the late
1990s, Lively moved to Sacramento, California. There, he
founded the Pro-Family Law Center and became involved in
litigation on behalf of conservative Christian causes.
For a while, he also served as director of the
California American Family Association. Sacramento, it
turns out, has a substantial Evangelical Christian,
Russian-immigrant community, due largely to a popular
shortwave radio station based there that used to
broadcast to the Soviet Union. Although Lively soon
moved to Temecula, near Los Angeles, his connections in
Sacramento opened the doors to a new world of antigay
activism. Russians and other Eastern Europeans had
suffered terrible atrocities at the hands of the Nazis,
and their children and grandchildren eagerly embraced
The Pink Swastika’s litany of conspiracy theories.
Together with the
Sacramento-based Russian radio host Vlad Kusakin,
Seattle pastor Kenneth Hutcherson, and Latvian
megachurch pastor Alexey Ledyaev, Lively founded the
Watchmen On the Walls, which quickly became closely
identified with violence, both rhetorical and real. When
LGBT advocates tried to hold a gay rights march in the
Latvian capital of Riga in 2006, a mob of parishioners
from Ledyaev’s New Generation Church pelted them with
eggs, rotten produce, and excrement as they tried to
leave a gay-affirming Anglican church. In May 2007,
Lively traveled to Riga and spoke at New Generation,
where he called the gay rights movement “the most
dangerous political movement in the world”[xxxiv]
and commended Ledyaev’s work in Latvia.
Meanwhile, back in
Sacramento, a group of Russian-speaking men killed
Satendar Singh, a 26-year-old gay Fijian of Indian
descent. One of the two men charged with the crime fled
to Russia. A month later, Lively traveled to Novosibirsk
for a Watchmen conference, where he spoke about Singh’s
death to cheers and applause. Lively tried to quiet the
celebration—“We don’t want homosexuals to be killed; we
want them to be saved”—but only after complaining that
the murder investigation and news coverage proved that
“homosexuals have achieved very high power… They’ve
begun to cause the political powers to punish anyone who
says that homosexuality is wrong.”[xxxv]
The Nuclear Option:
Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Bill
Lively’s demagoguery
took an even more dangerous turn when, in 2009, he
traveled to Uganda to deliver his now-infamous talk at
the Triangle Hotel. Two other U.S. evangelicals—Exodus
International board member Don Schmierer and
International Healing Foundation’s Caleb Lee
Brundidge—joined him to deliver what Lively later called
his “nuclear bomb against the gay agenda.”[xxxvi]
Lively threw everything he had into the talk: gays as
child abusers, gays as insatiable sexual predators, gays
bent on political domination, gays bent on the
destruction of civilization, gays as Nazis. And a new
one: gays as responsible for the Rwandan genocide.
The results were
disastrous for the LGBT community in Uganda, a country
that is already very conservative and deeply homophobic.
In the wake of Lively’s talk, radio stations launched
vigilante campaigns, reading out the names, addresses,
and places of employment of gay Ugandans. Newspapers
published their photos. LGBT people were attacked,
arrested, and subjected to blackmail. A few weeks after
the conference, mobs marched on the Ugandan Parliament
at the behest of conservative Ugandan pastors, demanding
new legislation to deal with the so-called homosexual
problem.
Parliament was
receptive to the idea. There had already been talk of
imposing new restrictions on Uganda's LGBT community,
and that idea took on added urgency immediately
following Lively's explosive talk.[xxxvii]
The morning after the Triangle Hotel conference, Lively
met with fifty to one hundred members of Parliament for
four hours to discuss ideas for a new law.[xxxviii]
Among his suggestions was that the Ugandan government
offer so-called restorative or reparative therapy, which
promises to turn LGBT people into heterosexuals, as an
alternative to life imprisonment—which, given the
conditions of a typical Ugandan prison would not have
been a difficult choice for most. Such therapies,
however, have been widely discredited as not only
ineffective but harmful, including by the American
Psychological Association. Another suggestion, which he
repeated often in his travels, was to impose a legal ban
on all advocacy on behalf of LGBT people.[xxxix]
In October 2009, the
Anti-Homosexuality Bill was introduced into the Ugandan
Parliament. The bill would impose the death penalty on
gays and lesbians under certain circumstances, including
for “repeat offenders”— anyone who had had more than one
relationship. The bill established a low bar for
conviction, making mere “touching” for the perceived
purpose of homosexual relations a criminal offense. It
threatened teachers, doctors, friends, and family
members with three years imprisonment if they didn’t
report anyone they suspected of being gay to police
within 24 hours. While Parliament ignored Lively’s call
for forced therapy, they did include his recommendation
to broadly criminalize all advocacy of homosexuality
including, conceivably, the legal defense of accused
gays. The bill even threatened landlords under a
“brothel” provision if they knowingly rented to LGBT
tenants.
Lively was proud of
his “nuclear bomb,”[xl]
even though he disavowed any responsibility for its
fallout. In fact, his first response was to claim that
the bill was the LGBT community’s fault. Ugandans, he
said, were merely reacting to “a lot of external
interference from European and American gay activists
attempting to do in Uganda what they’ve done around the
world—homosexualize that society.”[xli]
As for the bill
itself, Lively called it “a step in the right
direction,” although he said he opposed the death
penalty.[xlii]
But even there, he struggled. He told one interviewer
that given the alternative of seeing Uganda become more
accommodating to gays and lesbians, he would rather the
bill passed “as the lesser of two evils.”
“Even with the death
penalty?” an interviewer asked him. After much hemming
and hawing, Lively admitted that even as the “lesser of
two evils,” he would oppose the bill’s passage if it
included the death penalty.[xliii]
Lively’s Latest
Campaigns
Lively’s “nuclear
bomb” earned him worldwide condemnation—about which he
seemed ambivalent. Sometimes he appeared to relish the
attention; other times he tried to flee from it. In July
2009, Lively announced his “final book on the homosexual
issue.”
[xliv] He bragged that this book,
Redeeming the Rainbow, “is the product of twenty
years of service as a front-lines opponent of the
homosexual movement and encompasses all that I have
learned through this long tour of duty.” And with that,
he said would “no longer be monitoring the day-to-day
developments of the culture war regarding homosexuality
as closely, nor posting stories about it to this
website.”[xlv]
However, just a few weeks later, he was back to
obsessing about homosexuality. He had moved to
Springfield, Massachusetts, in 2008, and in August 2009
he traveled to Boston to testify against a transgender
rights bill. (To him, gender identity and sexual
orientation are indistinguishable.) After his testimony,
he gave an interview that was posted on YouTube.
“Frankly, I see things simply disintegrating very
rapidly and I believe that we’re going to suffer some
kind of infrastructure collapse in this society because
of the failure of moral culture,” he said.[xlvi]
In Springfield,
Lively initially worked at a church affiliated with
Ledyaev’s New Generation Church. In January 2011, he
reiterated to the Boston Globe that he was
through with talking about homosexuality, and that he
wanted to “re-Christianize Springfield.”[xlvii]
He explained, “If someone were looking for Scott Lively
to stop being involved in the other stuff [antigay
activity], this is it. Those people who criticize me,
they should be happy.” He opened the Holy Grounds coffee
shop, a drop-in center for Springfield youth.
Springfield officials expressed concern that truants
from a nearby high school were hanging out at the coffee
shop. The shop’s manager, Michael Frediani, was arrested
in January because he failed to register as a convicted
child-molester. Lively banned the students during
school hours, and defended his manager as someone who
had changed by converting to Christianity.
The Rev. Kapya Kaoma
is an Anglican priest from Zambia who attended Lively’s
talk in Uganda. As a PRA researcher, Kaoma wrote the
report,
Globalizing the Culture Wars,
about antigay organizing in Africa by U.S.-based
conservative Christians. Kaoma doesn’t think Lively’s
new focus is particularly credible. “Honestly, I
wouldn’t believe a thing from Scott Lively,” he said. “I
don’t even think he’s capable of toning down his antigay
rhetoric.”[xlviii]
As it turns out, Kaoma was right. In March 2011, Lively
traveled to the formerYugoslavian Republic of Macedonia
to denounce a proposed antidiscrimination law as the
product of “a secret plan by the homosexual powers of
the E.U.” He warned that its passage would result in an
“outbreak of homosexuality.”[xlix]
The Macedonian bill has been shelved for now.
Jim
Burroway
is the
editor of Box Turtle Bulletin (http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/),
a website founded in 2005 to analyze the claims of
antigay organizations. Jim was the first in the West to
break the story of Scott Lively’s fateful conference in
Kampala, Uganda, in 2009, and his website has faithfully
chronicled events in Uganda since then. He attends
conferences and other events to monitor antigay leaders
and organizations first hand.
|