|
The Public Eye Magazine, Vol.
VIII, No. 1 & 2, March/June
1994
Theocratic Dominionism Gains Influence
by Frederick Clarkson
Part 3
No Longer Without Sheep
Reconstructionism had been of interest to few outside the evangelical community
until the early 1990s, when its political significance began to emerge.
At the same time that the Coalition on Revival provided a catalyst (and
a cover) for the discussion, dissemination, and acceptance of Reconstructionist
doctrine, these ideas have percolated up through a wide swath of American
Protestantism. Nowhere, however, is Reconstructionism (sometimes known
as dominionism) having a more dramatic impact than in Pentecostal and charismatic
churches.
Pentecostalists, best known for speaking in tongues and practicing faith
healing and prophesy--known as "gifts of the spirit"--include televangelists
Jimmy Swaggart and Oral Roberts. Among well-known charismatics are Pat
Robertson and Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Historically, Pentecostals
have been apolitical for the most part. However, since 1980 much of Pentecostalism
has begun to adopt aspects of Reconstructionist or dominion theology.
This is not an accident.
Reconstructionists have sought to graft their theology onto the experientially
oriented, and often theologically amorphous, Pentecostal and charismatic
religious traditions. Following a 1987 Reconstructionist/ Pentecostal
theological meeting, Joseph Morecraft exclaimed: "God is blending Presbyterian
theology with charismatic zeal into a force that cannot be stopped!"
Gary North claims that "the ideas of the Reconstructionists have penetrated
into Protestant circles that for the most part are unaware of the original
source of the theological ideas that are beginning to transform them." North
describes the "three major legs of the Reconstructionist movement" as "the
Presbyterian oriented educators, the Baptist school headmasters and pastors,
and the charismatic telecommunications system."
What this means is that hundreds of thousands of Pentecostals and charismatic
Christians, as well as many fundamentalist Baptists, have moved out of
the apolitical camp. Many have thrown themselves into political work--not
merely as voters, but as ideologically driven activists, bringing a reconstructed "Biblical
world view" to bear on their area of activism.
This is probably the lasting contribution of Reconstructionism. Whether
it is Operation Rescue activists called to anti-abortion work because
of Francis Schaeffer's books, or Pentecostals who responded to the politicizing
ministry and electoral ambitions of Pat Robertson during the 1970s and
1980s, the politicization of Pentecostalism is one of the major stories
of modern American politics.
Indeed, Robertson has been pivotal in this process, mobilizing Pentecostals
and charismatics into politics through his books, TV programs, Regent
University, the 1988 presidential campaign, and his political organizations--first
the Freedom Council in the 1980s and then the Christian Coalition.
Gary North and others see opportunities for Reconstructionism to build
its influence through an activist response to crises in established institutions,
from the public schools to democracy itself. This "decentralist" activism
is not necessarily independent or "grassroots." Political brushfires
are "a fundamental tool of resistance" observes North, "but it takes
a combination of centralized strategy, and local mobilization and execution." This
is precisely what we are beginning to see clearly in the contemporary
politics of the Christian Right. From the lawsuits brought by the Rutherford
Institute and the American Center for Law and Justice to stealth takeovers
of school boards, the effort is to subvert the normal functioning of
society in order to make room for the growth of theocratic evangelicalism.
North sees a special role for the Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN)
TV satellite, as the epitome of the political effectiveness of televangelists.
He appreciates CBN's ability to magnify local battles, and communicate
them to a national audience. "Without a means of publicizing a crisis," writes
North, "few pastors would take a stand." Thus, North sees CBN as a key
component in increasing the impact of decentralized "brushfire wars" in
which the battles over abortion, pornography, zoning for Christian schools,
etc., happen in many places at once to strain the system.
Reconstructionism & the Christian Right
Reconstructionism has played an important role in shaping the contemporary
Christian Right, as indicated by the number of Christian Right leaders
involved in COR. Reconstructionism's influence is also pronounced in another
major hub of the Christian Right: the multifaceted organization of Pat
Robertson. Although it denies a Reconstructionist orientation, the Robertson
organization is doing exactly what Gary North describes. Robertson's Christian
Coalition, for instance, follows a clearly decentralist political plan,
directed and encouraged by highly centralized media, educational, and political
units.
The Christian Coalition, forged from Robertson's mailing lists and his
1988 presidential campaign, has become the largest and most politically
significant formation within the Religious Right. Its comprehensive,
locally focused efforts to take over the Republican Party "from the bottom
up" and to run "stealth candidates" for local offices have been widely
reported and discussed.
Robertson himself seems to lack the long-term vision of Reconstructionist
thinkers, but he is clearly driven by a short-term militant "dominion" mandate--the
mandate that Christians "Christianize" the country's social and political
institutions. He offers a fevered vision of power and "spiritual warfare," perhaps
even physical conflict with the forces of Satan in the near future. "The
world is going to be ours," he once confided, "but not without a battle,
[not] without bloodshed." At a 1994 Christian Coalition national strategy
conference, Robertson railed against "Satanic forces," declaring: "We
are not coming up against just human beings to beat them in elections.
We're going to be coming up against spiritual warfare. And if we're not
aware of what we're fighting, we will lose." No longer the exclusive
revolutionary vision of Christian Reconstructionist extremists, dominionism
has achieved virtual hegemony over many forms of Christian fundamentalism.
Historian Garry Wills sees dominionist doctrine not only in those "thorough
and consistent dominionists, the followers of Rousas John Rushdoony,
who are called Christian Reconstructionists," but also clearly present
in Pat Robertson's book The Secret Kingdom.
Robertson works not only dominionism, but Old Testament Biblical law
into his books. In The New World Order, Robertson writes that "there
is no way that government can operate successfully unless led by godly
men and women operating under the laws of the God of Jacob." Impatient
with Robertson's public equivocations, Reconstructionist author Gary
DeMar describes Robertson as an "operational Reconstructionist." Reconstructionist
influences are also evident at Robertson's Regent University. For example,
the longtime Dean of the Law School, Herb Titus, though not himself a
Reconstructionist, has used Rushdoony's book in his introductory Law
course. Texts by North and Rushdoony have been used for years in the
School of Public Policy, where Reconstructionist Joseph Kickasola teaches.
The library has extensive holdings of Reconstructionist literature and
tapes.
Regent University board chair Dee Jepson is a longtime COR Steering
Committee member. She was an active advocate for the school's change
of name from Christian Broadcast Network University to Regent University,
arguing that "Regent" better reflected its mission. Robertson explained
that a "regent" is one who governs in the absence of a sovereign and
that Regent U. trains students to rule, until Jesus, the absent sovereign,
returns. Robertson says Regent U. is "a kingdom institution" for grooming "God's
representatives on the face of the earth."
Dee Jepson, in addition to her membership on the COR Steering Committee,
is married to former Senator Roger Jepson (R-Iowa), who signed a fundraising
letter for Rushdoony's Chalcedon Foundation in 1982.
The Conspiracy Factor
One aspect of Reconstructionism's appeal to the Christian Right is that
it provides a unifying framework for conspiracy theories. Gary North explains
that: "There is one conspiracy, Satan's, and ultimately it must fail. Satan's
supernatural conspiracy is the conspiracy; all other visible conspiracies
are merely outworkings of this supernatural conspiracy." Pat Robertson
makes a similar argument in his book The New World Order, which all new
members of Robertson's Christian Coalition receive.
R. J. Rushdoony states that "The view of history as conspiracy. . .is a basic
aspect of the perspective of orthodox Christianity." A conspiratorial view
of history is a consistent ingredient of Christian Right ideology in the United
States, and is often used to explain the failure of conservative Christian
denominations with millennial ambitions to achieve or sustain political power.
The blame for this is most often assigned to the Masons, particularly an 18th-century
Masonic group called the Illuminati, and, ultimately, to Satan.
Panicked Congregationalist clergy, faced with disestablishment of state churches
(and thus their political power) in the 18th and 19th centuries, fanned the
flames of anti-Masonic hatred with conspiracy theories. Pat Robertson claims
Masonic conspiracies are out to destroy Christianity and thwart Christian rule.
Throughout The New
World Order Robertson refers to freemasonry as a Satanic conspiracy, along
with the New Age movement. The distortion of reality that can follow from such
views is well represented by Robertson's assertion that former Presidents Woodrow
Wilson, Jimmy Carter, and George Bush are unwitting agents of Satan because
they supported international groups of nations such as the United Nations.
Another example of Christian Right conspiracy theory is the writing of Dr.
Stanley Monteith, a California activist who is a member of the Christian Coalition
and the Coalition on Revival. He is a leading antigay spokesperson for the
Christian Right. In his book, AIDS, The Unnecessary Epidemic: America Under
Siege,
Monteith argues that AIDS is the result of a conspiracy of gays, humanists,
and other "sinister forces which work behind the scenes attempting to destroy
our society."
Monteith's book is published by a self-described Reconstructionist, Dalmar
D. Dennis (who is also a member of the National Council of the John Birch Society).
Monteith's actions underscore his words. At a conference of the anti-abortion
group Human Life International, Dr. Monteith, who insists he is not anti-Semitic,
shared a literature table with a purveyor of crude anti-Semitic books, as well
as books claiming to expose the Masonic conspiracy.
The Wrath of Morecraft
If the Christian Right ever came to power, it's anyone's guess what would actually
occur. But it may be instructive to examine what has happened as theocratically
informed factions advance locally. In Cobb County, Georgia, for example, where
the powerful County Commission is controlled by the Christian Right, homosexuality
has been banned, arts funding cut off, and abortion services through the county
public employee health plan banned. These actions by the Cobb County Commission
made national news in 1993. Rev. Joseph Morecraft, whose very energetic and politically
active
Reconstructionist Chalcedon Presbyterian Church draws most members from Marietta,
Georgia, the Cobb County seat, provided a clear Reconstructionist view of these
events. Asked at the time where he saw Biblical law advancing, he cited "the
county where I live," where "they passed a law. . .that homosexuals are not
welcome in that county, because homosexuality was against the community standards.
The next week," he continued, "they voted on whether or not they should use
tax money of the county to support art--immoral, pornographic art, so they
make the announcement, not only are we not going to use tax monies in this
county to sponsor pornographic art, we're not going to use tax money to sponsor
any art, because that's not the role of civil government. And last week," he
concluded, "[they voted] that no tax money in Cobb County will be spent on
abortions."
Such views pale before Morecraft's deeper views of life and government. In
his book, and especially when speaking at the 1993 Biblical World View and
Christian Education Conference, Morecraft discussed with relish the police
power of the state. His belief in the persecution of nonbelievers and those
who are insufficiently orthodox is crystal clear. Morecraft described democracy
as "mob rule," and stated that the purpose of "civil government" is to "terrorize
evil doers. . . to be an avenger!" he shouted, "To bring down the wrath of
God to bear on all those who practice evil!"
"And how do you terrorize an evil doer?" he asked. "You enforce Biblical law!" The
purpose of government, he said, is "to protect the church of Jesus Christ," and, "Nobody
has the right to worship on this planet any other God than Jehovah. And therefore
the state does not have the responsibility to defend anybody's pseudo-right
to worship an idol!" "There ain't no such thing" as religious pluralism, he
declared. Further, "There has never been such a condition in the history of
mankind. There is no such place now. There never will be." Transcendent Acts
Meanwhile, perhaps the most significant accomplishment of the Reconstructionist
movement has been the forging of an ideological pole (and an accompanying political
strategy) in American politics, a pole by which the Christian Right will continue
to measure itself. Some embrace it completely; others reject it. As recently
as the early 1990s, most evangelicals viewed Reconstructionists as a band of
theological misfits without a following. All that has changed, along with the
numbers and character of the Christian Right. The world of evangelicalism and,
arguably, American politics generally will not be the same.
Among those Reconstructionists who have already moved into positions of significant
power and influence are
two directors of R. J. Rushdoony's Chalcedon Foundation; philanthropist Howard
Ahmanson and political consultant Wayne C. Johnson, epitomize the political
strategy of the new Christian Right.
Heir to a large fortune, Howard Ahmanson is an important California power
broker who has said, "My purpose is total integration of Biblical law into
our lives." He bankrolls Christian Right groups and political campaigns, largely
through an unincorporated entity called the Fieldstead Company, which has,
for example, been a major contributor to Paul Weyrich's Free Congress Foundation.
Fieldstead has also co-published, with Crossway
Books, a series of Reconstructionist-oriented books called Turning Point:
Christian Worldview Series, which is widely available in Christian bookstores.
Ahmanson and his wife have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars supporting
California political candidates, as well as supporting the 1993 California
school voucher initiative and the 1992 voucher initiative in Colorado. He has
also teamed up with a small group of conservative businessmen, notably Rob
Hurtt of Container Supply Corporation, to form a series of political action
committees. The direct donations from these PACs and the personal contributions
of Ahmanson and Hurtt, coupled with those of other PACs to which the group
substantially contributed, amounted to nearly $3 million to 19 right-wing candidates
for the California State Senate and various other conservative causes in 1992.
A dozen candidates backed by the Christian Right won. Ahmanson himself is a
member of the GOP state central committee, along with many other Christian
Rightists, who have gained power by systematically taking over California GOP
county committees.
A political operative named Wayne Johnson, who had been an architect of California's
1990 term limits initiative, managed the campaigns of several Ahmanson-backed
candidates in 1992. The practical impact of term limits is to remove the advantage
of incumbency (both Democratic and Republican) which the extreme Christian
Right is prepared to exploit, having created a disciplined voting bloc and
the resources to finance candidates.
At a Reconstructionist conference in 1983, Johnson outlined an early version
of the strategy we see operating in California today. According to Johnson,
the principal factor in determining victory in California state legislative
races is incumbency, by a factor of 35 to 1. The legislature at the time was
dominated by Democrats (and
Republicans unacceptable to conservatives). The key for the Christian Right
was to be able to: 1) remove or minimize the advantage of incumbency, and 2)
create a disciplined voting bloc from which to run candidates in Republican
primaries, where voter turn out was low and scarce resources could be put to
maximum effect. Since the early 1990s, Christian Rightists have been able to
do both. Thanks to Ahmanson, Hurtt, and others, they also now have the financing
to be competitive. Since the mid-1970s, the extreme Christian Right, under
the tutelage of then-State Senator H. L Richardson, targeted open seats and
would finance only challengers, not incumbents. By 1983, they were able to
increase the number of what Johnson called "reasonably decent guys" in the
legislature from four to 27. At the Third Annual Northwest Conference for Reconstruction
in 1983, Johnson stated that he believed they may achieve "political hegemony.
. .in this generation." In 1994, they were not far from that goal. Rob Hurtt
won a 1993 open seat by election for State Senate. In 1994, State Senator Hurtt
was also the chairman of the Republican campaign committee for the State Legislature,
an important power brokering role for a freshman State Senator. The GOP, led
by conservative Christians, was only four seats away from majority control
in 1994.
A Whole Generation of Gary Norths
Still, it is in the next generation that most Reconstructionists hope to seize
the future. "All long-term social change," declares Gary North, "comes from the
successful efforts of one or another struggling organizations to capture the
minds of a hard core of future leaders, as well as the respect
of a wider population." The key to this, they believe, lies with the Christian
school and the home schooling movement, both deeply influenced by Reconstructionism.
Unsurprisingly, Reconstructionists seek to abolish public schools, which they
see as a critical component in the promotion of a secular world view. It is
this secular world view with which they declare themselves to be at war. "Until
the vast majority of Christians pull their children out of the public schools," writes
Gary North, "there will be no possibility of creating a theocratic republic."
Among the top Reconstructionists in education politics is Robert Thoburn of
Fairfax Christian School in Fairfax, Virginia. Thoburn advocates that Christians
run for school board, while keeping their own children out of public schools. "Your
goal" (once on the board), he declares, "must be to sink the ship." While not
every conservative Christian who runs for school board shares this goal, those
who do will, as Thoburn advises, probably keep it to themselves. Thoburn's
book, The Children Trap, is a widely used sourcebook for Christian Right attacks
on public education.
Joseph Morecraft, who also runs a school, said in 1987: "I believe the children
in the Christian schools of America are the Army that is going to take the
future. Right now. . .the Christian Reconstruction movement is made up of a
few preachers, teachers, writers, scholars, publishing houses, editors of magazines,
and it's growing quickly. But I expect a massive acceleration of this movement
in about 25 or 30 years, when those kids that are now in Christian schools
have graduated and taken their places in American society, and moved into places
of influence and power."
Similarly, the Christian "home schooling" movement is part of the longterm
revolutionary strategy of Reconstructionism. One of the principal home schooling
curricula is provided by Reconstructionist Paul Lindstrom of Christian Liberty
Academy (CLA) in Arlington Heights, Illinois. CLA claims that it serves about
20,000 families. Its 1994 curriculum included a book on "Biblical Economics" by
Gary North. Home schooling advocate Christopher Klicka, who has been deeply
influenced by R. J. Rushdoony, writes: "Sending our children to the public
school violates nearly every Biblical principle. . . .It is tantamount to sending
our children to be trained by the enemy." He claims that the public schools
are Satan's choice. Klicka also advocates religious selfsegregation and advises
Christians not to affiliate with non-Christian home schoolers in any way. "The
differences I am talking about," declares Klicka, "have resulted in wars and
martyrdom in the not too distant past." According to Klicka, who is an attorney
with the Home School Legal Defense Association, "as an organization, and as
individuals, we are committed to promote the cause of Christ and His Kingdom."
Estimates of the number of home schooling families vary enormously. Conservatively,
there are certainly over 100,000. Klicka estimates that 85-90 percent of home
schoolers are doing so "based on their religious convictions." "In effect," he
concludes, "these families are operating religious schools in their homes." A
fringe movement no longer, Christian home schoolers are being actively recruited
by the archconservative Hillsdale College.
Frederick Clarkson is an author and lecturer who has written extensively on
right-wing religious groups from the Christian Coalition to the Unification
Church. He is co-author of Challenging the Christian Right: The Activist's
Handbook, (Institute for First Amendment Studies, 1992), and is author of Eternal
Hostility: The Struggle Between Democracy and Theocracy in the UnitedStates,
(Common Courage Press, 1996). This article originally appeared in the March
and June 1994 issues of The Public Eye.
|
|