How Some Recanted Muslims Have Bolstered Militarist US Policies
by Samer Araabi, Rightweb
There is a tendency among right-wing think tanks in the United States involved in Middle East policy to employ “experts” from the region to bolster their pro-war advocacy campaigns. [Read More...]
More on Shoebat:The Palestinian 'terrorist' turned Zionist
Jorg Luyken, Jerusalem Post, 03/30/2008 01:07
According to Richard Bartholomew, "Shoebat is a pseudo-expert on terrorism, Islamic extremism, and Biblical prophecy, and he teaches that Obama is a secret Muslim and that the Bible has prophesised a Muslim anti-Christ."
US Air Force Academy Encourages Islamophobia?
by Abdus Sattar Ghazali - Muslim Military Members Website
Abdus Sattar Ghazali wrote about Shoebat and other anti-Islamic bigots on the website of Muslim Military Members, "an organization providing information, communication, and coordination for Muslims in the US Armed Forces." "Walid Shoebat has built a lucrative speaking career by manipulating the fears and whipping up hatred between Jews and Muslims," wrote Ghazali.
Talk to Action Website
by Thomas Cincotta
After September 11, 2001, Congress ordered the creation of an "information sharing environment" to improve communication between law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Instead of better "connecting the dots," the government and law enforcement executives developed a problematic system to generate more data dots concerning everyday activities. This counterproductive effort threatens to erode community trust and clog intelligence pipelines with junk data derived from racial, ethnic, religious, and ideological bias. While information sharing is a worthy goal, the shift in focus to "non-criminal activity" can only make the task harder; it is problematic for a democratic society from the standpoints of both safety and civil liberties.
"[Suspicious Activity Reporting] is one issue that will re-shape the American experience as we know it and yet most of us are uninformed. This report can help you begin to learn about the issue." -- Bilal Kaleem, Exec. Director of Muslim American Society of Boston
"The[state-federal] collaborations detailed in this report fuse the atom of sovereignty in ways that would have been especially troubling to a Founding generation concerned with a distant leviathan exercising unaccountable powers." – Aziz Huq, Asst. Professor, University of Chicago Law School
In this report, which includes a case study of Los Angeles' SAR-processing center, PRA:
“PRA’s report unmasks a new government initiative with the sole function of further criminalizing immigrants and communities of color . . . It exposes this program for what it is – a mechanism that inevitably fosters wide-spread racial profiling and perilously ineffective public safety policies.” – Manisha Vaze, Organizer for Families for Freedom
CAIR and the Islamic Shura Council host PRA at a Town Hall Forum in Anaheim, CA
On March 5, 2010, PRA Civil Liberties project leader Thomas Cincotta and investigator Mary Fisher joined ACLU attorney Peter Bibring and Shakeel Syed, director of the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California to discuss the institutionalization of suspicious activity reporting, the unconstitutional aspects of Los Angeles’ Special Order #11, and the effects of the programs on communities. The event was also co-sponsored by Interfaith Communities United for Justice and Peace. Listen to audio from the event.
Expose Domestic Surveillance Practices
Past instances of government abuses, such as FBI’s COINTELPRO program, indicate that the traditionally secretive and insular security apparatus tends to act independent of executive, legislative, and judicial mandates, particularly if oversight is lax or its mission is inadequately defined. Beyond specific post-9/11 policies and initiatives, the organizational and legal framework underlying the current domestic security apparatus are designed to outlast any immediate crisis and may pose a long-term threat to civil liberties. In any event, it is difficult to marshal the will to turn back that which is not even understood.
To build pressure for institutional reform, there is a critical need to expose current domestic security and surveillance practices. In 1971, a group of activists calling themselves the Commission to Investigate the FBI obtained and publicly released the first public disclosure of the FBI’s COINTELPRO tactics – large scale covert efforts to disrupt legitimate political activities. The FBI revelations, coupled with disclosures of improper activity by the CIA and NSA, eventually caused Congress to establish select committees to investigate such abuses.
PRA’s Civil Liberties Project aspires to expose and demystify the working of the domestic surveillance infrastructure. We aim to produce actionable information that supports local and national efforts for civil liberties defense and reform.
You can help by shedding light on domestic security practices in your city and state.
You can order a range of printed materialsfrom books and
topical reports to bibliographies and resource listsfrom
PRA through the mail. Download and print out our publications
list and order form, complete with prices and shipping information.
Prepaid orders are accepted by mail.
Political Research Associates
PRA is an affiliate of:
Links listed on various pages of the PRA website are provided on an "as-is" and "information-only" basis. Presence of a link does not necessarily imply PRA's endorsement or approval. If a link is no longer in service please contact us. PRA reserves the right to remove link listings at any time. We will not knowingly link to sites that sell information without paying copyright fees to the original authors.
Political Research Associates
PRA is an affiliate of:
Unless otherwise noted, all material on this website is copyright 1981-2013 by Political Research Associates
Political Research Associates • 1310 Broadway, Suite 201 • Somerville, MA 02144
Voice: 617.666.5300 • Fax: 617.666.6622 • firstname.lastname@example.org