Washington, DC — Each month, Bill Hybels, senior pastor of suburban
Chicago's 15,000-member Willow Creek Community Church, meets with
President Bill Clinton for the purpose of "personal spiritual
mentoring."
"It is a non-ideological, non-political series of conversations. It is
about his own attempts to develop spiritually. It is to encourage his
understanding of God's Word and how he needs to apply that to his life
and to his being a father and a husband and a leader," explained
Hybels.
Hybels said that, although he disagrees "quite dramatically" with some
of Clinton's policies, he believes it is the responsibility of all
Christians to "genuinely pray for Bill Clinton and his family" and to
"discipline themselves to talk and act respectfully" about him, even
if they disapprove of his policies.
"I think it is important to influence the political process, to call
the government into account," said Hybels, "but also to never lose
sight of the fact that, if you are going to change a culture, you will
do it one life at a time." (Source: The Pastor's Weekly
Briefing, February 23, 1996)
Windham, Maine — With the abundance of "super churches" (5,000 or more
members) in the United States, many evangelical and conservative
church leaders are basking in the glory of new-found phenomenal
growth. Religious political extremist groups are eyeing these churches
as a rich source of voters and activists.
The church-growth movement, however, is not appreciated by every
pastor. "The church growth movement is indeed the bitch goddess of the
ecclesiastical machine," according to the Rev. J. Grant Swank, of
Windham, Maine. Rev. Swank lists three reasons for his strong
statement:
"The church growth movement relies too heavily on human analysis,
human projections. The enemy of the mind of God is reliance on human
thought.
"The church growth movement is enamored by human methodologies, human
blueprints.
"The church growth movement is bloating human egos. Prancing
statistical gains and brag charts is actually baptized by religious
leaders who claim to be spiritual models."
"What do we do," Swank wrote in the March 1996 Chalcedon
Report, "with the bitch goddess' glitzy garb — name-dropping,
grabbing apparel, mammoth structures, millions in impressive revenue,
knock-out p.r.? The answer: 'This too shall pass.'"
Birdsboro, Pennsylvania — Last year, many Christian conservatives in
Pennsylvania supported Peg Luksik's bid for governor. Although Luksik
is ultra-conservative and anti-abortion, not every conservative
clergyman supported her. Why? Because she is a woman.
In response to Luksik's candidacy, the Rev. William O. Einwechter, of
Covenant Christian Church, expressed his opposition to women
candidates in an article in the March 1996 Chalcedon
Report.
"I believe the Bible," Rev. Einwechter wrote, "gives a clear and
definite answer to this question: women are not permitted by God to
hold political office and rule over men in the political sphere. There
are four well-marked lines of evidence in the Bible that establish
that women are not to hold political office." His four
reasons are:
"The Biblical doctrine of the headship of man disqualifies a woman for
civil office.
"The Biblical qualifications for civil office require civil leaders to
be men.
"The Biblical picture of a virtuous woman is against a woman holding
civil office. (The center of her interest and the place of her
ministry is her home.)
"The Biblical lament that 'women rule over them' confirms the error of
a woman holding civil office. The fact that [in the Bible] Israel has
women reigning over them is seen to be the result of sin and a part of
God's retributive justice; it is certainly not considered a blessing
in the text!"
Einwechter believes that the presence of women in politics is a sign
that men "have utterly failed to exercise the leadership required of
them." In conclusion he wrote, "Therefore, Christians must not support
a woman for the office of civil magistrate. It is imperative that
Christians labor to restore God's order for the family, the church,
and the state [his emphasis]."
Arvada, Colorado — The much-touted Promise Keepers conservative
Christian men's movement announced its upcoming 1996 conferences. They
are: Los Angeles, April 19-20; Seattle, May 10-11; Kansas City, MO,
April 26-27; Detroit, May 10-11; Minneapolis, May 10-11; Washington,
DC, May 24-25; Boise, ID, June 7-8; Syracuse, NY, June 7-8; Charlotte,
NC, June 21-22; Chicago, June 28- 29; San Diego, July 12-13;
Pittsburgh, July 12-13; New Orleans, July 26-27; Indianapolis, July
26-27; Eugene, OR, Aug. 2-3; Memphis, Oct. 11-12; and Jacksonville,
FL, Oct. 18-19. The Minneapolis and Detroit events are sold out.
This year, the group expects attendance to surpass one million.
Promise Keepers employs 300, and operates on a budget of $64 million.
On February 13, 1996, Promise Keepers held its first Clergy Conference
for Men at Atlanta's Georgia Dome indoor football stadium. Nearly
40,000 ministers attended — possibly the largest gathering of
ministers ever held anywhere. Some observers see Promise
Keepers as a potentially forceful political movement in lock-step with
religious political extremists. Many of the movement's current leaders
are politically active.
Denver, Colorado — From now on, Colorado taxpayers won't pay for
chaplains in its prisons. The House State Affairs Committee said that
the $300,000 cost was exorbitant. Rep. Phil Pankye (R-Littleton)
asked why churches couldn't pay for the chaplains. Lucia Guzman, head
of the Colorado Council of Churches, backed a bill to fund the
chaplains and said the state and church "should be in greater
partnership." With countless churches and missionary groups eager to
evangelize, prisons should experience no shortage in free chaplains.
While prisoners have a right to religious counsel, those services
should never be at taxpayer's expense.
Colorado Springs, Colorado — Dr. James Dobson and more than a dozen
other Christian leaders recently sent a letter to Republican National
Committee chairman Haley Barbour, House Speaker Newt Gingrich and the
GOP presidential primary candidates urging them to uphold the pro-life
plank in the national Republican Party platform.
The letter, sent on Feb. 29, asks, "Since when have right and wrong
been determined by the shifting sands of public opinion?" (Nationwide,
most Republicans are opposed to the party's call for an anti-abortion
amendment to the U.S. Constitution.)
"The Republican Party — the party of Lincoln — understood slavery as
an unmitigated evil and fought a bloody war to eradicate it. They
[sic] stood on principle — not because it was popular or easy — but
because it was the right thing to do. We pray that today's political
leaders will summon a measure of that courage and conviction in this
critical year of decision."
Other signers included Dr. D. James Kennedy, John M. Perkins, Russell
Shaw, George Weigel, Father Richard Neuhaus, Dr. Adrian Rogers, Dr.
Charles Swindoll, Dr. Edwin Young, William Ball, Dr. Paul Cedar, Dr.
Brandt Gustavson, Dr. William Bright, Charles Colson, Dr. Ted
Engstrom, and Dr. Jim Henry.
A similar letter was not sent to Democratic Party leaders since that
party has shown no openness to a pro-life plank in its platform.
(Source: The Pastor's Weekly Briefing, March 8,
1996)
Erie, Pennsylvania — One of the Christian Coalition's most effective
state organizations, the Pennsylvania Christian Coalition, broke its
ties with the national group on December 23, 1995. Rick Schenker,
former Pennsylvania Christian Coalition state director, formed a new
group called the Pennsylvania Coalition.
Schenker publishes a newsletter called "Insider Report" for the new
organization. In the January issue Schenker wrote, "We will try to
retain a loose relationship with Ralph Reed and the Christian
Coalition, but we feel we can do more for the citizens of
this state as an independent organization."
Schenker is developing what he calls "an internal political action
committee." He said, "This is something we could not do if we remained
officially affiliated. We were not able to help candidates that
desperately needed it."
While Schenker is downplaying tensions between his group and the
Christian Coalition, others don't see it that way. "We have been
having major problems with Mr. Schenker for the past two years," a
Christian Coalition source in Pennsylvania said. "The national office
is now reforming a new chapter in Pennsylvania called the
Christian Coalition of Pennsylvania, so as not to add confusion.
Please, and I repeat, please do not send financial support to the
Pennsylvania Christian Coalition, which is defunct, or the new
Pennsylvania Coalition."
While Schenker seems to enjoy a lot of support for his new group, one
former supporter wrote, "Since I strongly disagree with your break
from the Christian Coalition, remove my name from your list. I will
continue to support Ralph Reed's fine organization." (Source: cc
watch)Mentoring the president
Church growth movement castigated
Pastor opposes women candidates
Coming to a city near you
Colorado won't pay for chaplains
Christian leaders urge pro-life plank
retention
Christian Coalition split in Erie