|
New York/Somerville - March 9 -Today, in a comprehensive 80-page
report that details a systemic failure to regulate content
in nationwide counter-terrorism training,
Political Research Associates (PRA), exposes the
inaccurate and conspiratorial myths that may put the rights of
millions of American Muslims at risk from the very public
servants who have sworn to protect them. The
nine-month investigation, aimed at increasing government
oversight into both funding and content of private
counter-terrorism programs, highlights three key firms whose
speakers and materials promote a range of harmful teachings, and
the possible repercussions if corrective actions are not
immediately implemented.
The report appears as the House Homeland Security Committee
prepares to conduct controversial hearings on the alleged threat
of homegrown Islamic terrorism.
The Boston-based
research group reports the appropriation of $1.67 billion in
federal funds to states in 2010 for the purpose of
counter-terrorism training, with critical gaps in oversight of
the money. The practices of three groups illustrate the dangers
in the lack of regulation: the
International Counter-Terrorism Officers Association (ICTOA),
the Center for Counterintelligence and Security Studies (CI
Centre), and Security Solutions International (SSI), the latter
two of which claim a collective exposure to upwards of 130,000
security professionals.
"America
faces very real threats of violent terrorism, yet, trainers from
the organizations in our study draw from a variety of
anti-Islamic frames to teach public servants conspiracy theories
about stealth infiltration of America that echo the shameful
witch hunts of McCarthyism,"
says Thom Cincotta, author of the report.
"In the process," he adds, "they
may put millions of Americans at risk both in terms of security
and in terms of protecting their constitutional rights."
In the investigation, PRA reveals a common set of conspiratorial
myths propagated in varying degrees by speakers from all three
organizations. These narratives equate Islam with terrorism and
depict a covert effort by American Muslim "stealth jihadists" to
infiltrate U.S. institutions for the purpose of bringing down
American infrastructure and, eventually, implementing Shariah
Law. Walid Phares, once slated for testimony at Rep. King's
hearings before complaints by rights groups derailed the effort,
teaches "The Global Jihadist Threat Doctrine," at the CI Centre.
Phares claims "Jihadists within the West pose as civil rights
advocates, interested solely in the 'rights' of their immigrant
communities," "radicals sweep into community institutions using
petrodollar funding," and "[a]lmost all mosques, educational
centers, and socioeconomic institutions fall into their hands."
Walid Shoebat, a frequent guest speaker at ICTOA,
self-proclaimed ex-terrorist, and reformed-Muslim (he is now
Christian) goes so far as to say "Islam is of the Devil."
Effects of anti-Muslim training are evidenced by stories like
that of the Henderson, Nevada police department, whose officers
surrounded and arrested a group of Muslim men for praying in a
parking lot. When pressed as to why, an officer indicates his
actions were "based on the studies, the classes that I have gone
to, and based on the events that happened around the world."
Incidents of unwarranted searches, detentions, or interrogations
of innocent Muslim Americans are neither isolated nor
coincidental.
Brigitte Nacos, author of
Terrorism and Counterterrorism adds,
"When the virus of Islamophobia is
spread in courses and conferences for police and intelligence
officers, as the report reveals, this does not bode well for
cooperation and a relationship of trust between law enforcement
and American Muslim communities. Most disconcerting is the
revelation that those events are sponsored or condoned by
federal and local agencies and that participant fees are paid by
taxpayers."
Authors of the report emphasize that the actions of these firms
may break down communication between law enforcement agents and
Muslim communities, which have proven to be strong allies in the
rare instances of domestic extremism. Further, they state,
focusing our security personnel on Muslim Americans ignores
threats from non-Islamist terror groups: from anti-government
militias, to right-wing extremist groups, to white-supremacists.
The solutions, they say, are to pass effective legislation for
standards and oversight of the counterterrorism industry, and
against racial profiling, and for law enforcement to be more
effectively trained at working with Muslim communities.
For access to the full report:
http://www.publiceye.org/liberty/training/project-home.html
|